Suggestion [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-12-07 15:01 (3396 d 01:17 ago) – Posting: # 15703
Views: 29,316

Hi Yung-jin,

❝ ❝ [...] In a future version, could you add an option to generate randomisation schemes for the various BE designs?


❝ […] It's a really great idea. I will put this into the top of to-do-list.


One option is to include Detlew’s package randomizeBE as a dependency when building the package. Then you don’t have to re-invent the wheel and only need to handle the in-/output within bear.

❝ The other one is considering BE dataset simulation based on the in-vitro dissolution profile and PBPK (IVIVC + PBPK -> IVIVE??).


Wow!

❝ Also there is a TSD waiting for years...


According to EMA’s Q&A (Rev.7 of 2013-02-13) the model for the final analysis (pooled data) is:
stage, sequence, sequence × stage, subject(sequence × stage), period(stage), formulation.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,713 registered users;
32 visitors (1 registered, 31 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:19 CET (Europe/Vienna)

It’s easy to lie with statistics;
it is easier to lie without them.    Frederick Mosteller

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5