Suggestion [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-12-07 15:01 (3052 d 21:36 ago) – Posting: # 15703
Views: 27,897

Hi Yung-jin,

❝ ❝ [...] In a future version, could you add an option to generate randomisation schemes for the various BE designs?


❝ […] It's a really great idea. I will put this into the top of to-do-list.


One option is to include Detlew’s package randomizeBE as a dependency when building the package. Then you don’t have to re-invent the wheel and only need to handle the in-/output within bear.

❝ The other one is considering BE dataset simulation based on the in-vitro dissolution profile and PBPK (IVIVC + PBPK -> IVIVE??).


Wow!

❝ Also there is a TSD waiting for years...


According to EMA’s Q&A (Rev.7 of 2013-02-13) the model for the final analysis (pooled data) is:
stage, sequence, sequence × stage, subject(sequence × stage), period(stage), formulation.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,984 posts in 4,822 threads, 1,650 registered users;
53 visitors (0 registered, 53 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design.    Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5