Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Apples are pears by comparing the weight

Apples are pears by comparing the weight [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2015-12-03 10:16 (3393 d 13:55 ago) – Posting: # 15691
Views: 13,374

Dear Helmut,

❝ The line

❝ res[j, 7] <- sprintf("%.0f", max(cum))

❝ should be replaced by

❝ res[j, 7] <- sprintf("%.1f", (1-tmp1$pct_s2/100)*n[1] +


❝                                 (tmp1$pct_s2/100)*max(cum))

❝

❝ E[N]


❝             ───────────
❝ expected N   GSD    TSD
❝ ───────────────────────

❝     50      71.3   63.7

❝    100      84.6   99.2

❝ Interesting.

:confused:

What's your expected N?

BTW: ? cumsum.

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Helmut 2015-11-27 19:05 [Two-Stage / GS Designs]
- Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD ElMaestro 2015-11-27 19:54
- “classical” GSD - E[n] d_labes 2015-11-30 11:15
  - Apples are pears by comparing the weight Helmut 2015-12-01 16:35
    - Apples are pears by comparing the weightd_labes 2015-12-03 09:16
      - Apples are pears by comparing the weight Helmut 2015-12-03 13:10
        
        Oranges d_labes 2015-12-03 13:56
- Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Ben 2015-12-02 19:27
  - Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Helmut 2015-12-03 03:11
    - “classical” GSD alpha's d_labes 2015-12-03 09:47
      - N sufficiently large‽ Helmut 2015-12-03 14:56
        
        An other one with 0.0304 d_labes 2015-12-03 16:15
        
        An other one with 0.0304 Helmut 2015-12-03 16:26
    - Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Ben 2016-01-10 12:43

Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,669 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:12 CET (Europe/Vienna)

I have not failed 700 times. I have not failed once.
I have succeeded in proving
that those 700 ways will not work. Thomas Alva Edison

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz