What else? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2015-11-05 22:28 (3427 d 14:33 ago) – Posting: # 15621
Views: 8,264

Hi f.b.,

❝ In case of performing a study with an endogenous substances such as hormones what would be the approach to justify an ocurrance of a sequence effect for HA? Premisse: You have an adequate washout period, and you have found this effect....:crying:

(...)

❝ What else could be done?


If P(Seq) is low then it means your metric objectively differed between the two sequences. Perhaps the randomisation "was not effective"; check your descriptive statistics. If all the fat ones ended up in TR and all the Jane Fonda types were in RT then that would be one obvious reason, but you cannot prove it as a hindsight consideration. It would however, be a likely explanation. Can happen by chance.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,709 registered users;
27 visitors (0 registered, 27 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:01 CET (Europe/Vienna)

It’s easy to lie with statistics;
it is easier to lie without them.    Frederick Mosteller

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5