posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-11-02 16:13 (2884 d 18:57 ago) – Posting: # 15606
Views: 7,286


❝ […] I can't catch the idea why AUMC is required? :confused:

In the BE-context you generally don’t need it at all. It’s only an intermediate step in calculating MRT. Who asked for it?

❝ Can anybody explain me? :-)

We can see plasma profiles as the result of a stochastic process (drug molecules are absorbed, distributed, and metabolized/excreted). At any given time point a certain fraction is in the cir­cu­la­tion. Hey, that’s a sta­tis­tical distribution!

Distributions can be described by ‘statistical moments’

\(S_0=\int f(x)dx\)
\(S_1=\int x\cdot f(x)dx\)
\(S_2=\int x^2\cdot f(x)dx\)

where \(\small{S_0}\) is the AUC and \(\small{S_1}\) the AUMC (Area Under the Moment Curve). In PK \(\small{x=t}\) and \(\small{f(x)=C}\). We need the AUMC to calculate the MRT (Mean of Residence Times), which is for
Rule of thumb: After MRT ~⅔ of the drug is eliminated.

S2 is rarely used (for the calculation of the ‘Variance of Residence Times’): VRT = S2/S0 – (S1/S0)2. MRT and VRT are the coordinates (x|y) of the ‘center of gravity’ of the profile. Try it: Plot a PK-curve on cardboard and stick a pin through x|y. Makes a nice children’s wind wheel.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,759 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,628 registered users;
22 visitors (0 registered, 22 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one,
take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory
nor the problem which it was intended to solve.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz