Baseline; another example [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-09-18 19:16 (3141 d 23:34 ago) – Posting: # 15431
Views: 19,171

Dear Ohlbe,

another example explaining the method outlined in this post.
There might not only be circadian fluctuations in the baseline but others with a lower frequency super­imposed. The BL [12–25] consists of [10–20] within the day and [2–5] within a 28-days cycle. Let’s explore a four-period study:

[image]

Fat lines are the pre-dose profiles to be sampled prior to administrations in each period according to the EMA’s GL.

What happens if we subtract these values from the the ones on the following days? I plotted the dif­fe­rences (ignoring the if-negative-set-to-zero rule).

[image]

There will be small biases because the GL’s method assumes that baselines on dosing days are es­sen­ti­ally identical to the ones before. The largest absolute bias is observed in periods 1 and 3 because we are close to the inflection points of the 28-days cycle. Less bias in periods 2 and 4 (close to the max­i­mum and minimum).

The alternative method. Sampling only one baseline before period 1 and adjusting for the predose value in each period.

[image]

Not so nice. However, think about the doubled sampling volume in the GL’s method…

Let’s dose! Identical BA in all periods (the true Cmax 2.75 times the maximum baseline). What we would observe (periods stacked):

[image]

First the GL’s method:

[image]

Next the alternative:

[image]

Practically superimposible profiles, methods almost indistinguishible. :-D
Bias (expressed as %RE). GL = 1, alternative = 2:

method     1     2      1     2  
period       AUCt         Cmax    
  1      +0.97 +0.04  +0.48 -0.07
  2      -0.22 -0.40  -0.07 -0.35
  3      -0.96 -1.03  -0.48 -0.03
  4      +0.22 -0.60  +0.07 +0.25

I can live with it; especially given that with the alternative method one needs 37.5% less blood samples.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,651 registered users;
102 visitors (0 registered, 102 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5