PE outside the acceptance range [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-07-27 14:36 (3527 d 15:22 ago) – Posting: # 15154
Views: 10,060

Hi Aan,

❝ As per the regulatory requirements and guidelines for modified release tablet both fasting and fed study is recommended (MHRA, USFDA etc).


Exactly. BTW, MHRA follows EMA’s GLs.

❝ Regulatory agency - MHRA UK, canada, MOH UAE. will they accept the study if fasting meets the criteria and the fed study fails.


Why should they (i.e., ignoring their own rules)?
Esomeprazole exhibits a pronounced food effect (reduced BA). Although dosing in the fasted state is recommended in the innovator product’s label/SmPC in a generic application you have to show BE for both fasting/fed conditions. I don’t know on which side your product failed (upper = less food effect or lower = higher food effect). Even in the former case, the test product is not similar to the reference, but “better”. In some legislations you could opt for a “hybrid application” which would require an additional clinical study.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,677 registered users;
12 visitors (0 registered, 12 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:58 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There are no routine statistical questions,
only questionable statistical routines.    David R. Cox

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5