PE outside the acceptance range [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-07-27 14:14 (3527 d 16:05 ago) – Posting: # 15150
Views: 10,073

Dear Aan,

❝ Fed Study - The Test to Reference ratio of geometric LSmeans for the Cmax was outside the acceptance range of 80 to 125%


OK, that’s the end of the story – even for the least restrictive (i.e., Canadian) requirement.

❝ 90% confidence interval was also outside the widened range of 75 to 133%.

❝ Please advice me whether the product will be accepted as generic by the regulatory authority if the fed study fails but fasting study is succesful.


In the future please tell us which regulatory agency you are aiming at. Requirements differ around the globe. A (prespecified!) widened acceptance range of 75–133% is rarely applicable nowadays.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,677 registered users;
16 visitors (0 registered, 16 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:19 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There are no routine statistical questions,
only questionable statistical routines.    David R. Cox

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5