Call for duty [Software]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2015-07-21 15:04 (3498 d 03:08 ago) – Posting: # 15119
Views: 20,586

Dear Helmut,

❝ On the other hand agencies published SAS-code for some BE-methods (FDA: RSABE for HVDs and NTIDs; EMA: ABEL). It is certainly easier to copy-paste code compared to setting up / validating it in PHX/WNL (took me some weeks). Up to now nobody succeeded to code this stuff in R. :crying:


If you mean the statistics of such methods: Which one do you like first? I could imagine some ambitious R-coders out there which could be able to do the job.
Except of course implementing the SAS Proc mixed code for replicate designs :PCchaos:.

BTW: The reason for using SAS for the stats is very, very easy: "SAS is validated."

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,381 posts in 4,914 threads, 1,663 registered users;
51 visitors (0 registered, 51 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:13 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones.
But a collection of facts is no more a science
than a heap of stones is a house.    Henri Poincaré

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5