Log in
Register"solved" ??? [Bioanalytics]
Dear janmacek,
No, one problem is solved, but the problem is not.
And this is the real problem. The fact that an ECPRS product is not accompanied by a CoA specifying its purity probably only relates to the fact that it is difficult. It certainly would otherwise be both relevant and highly useful and appreciated by companies traditionally relying on reference standards.
❝ They really did so by eliminating the reference to European Pharmacopoeia Certified Reference Standards, EPCRS (see EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009 Rev. 1 Corr. 2) and the problem is thus solved.
No, one problem is solved, but the problem is not.
❝ In the future studies the EPCRS cannot be used anymore.
And this is the real problem. The fact that an ECPRS product is not accompanied by a CoA specifying its purity probably only relates to the fact that it is difficult. It certainly would otherwise be both relevant and highly useful and appreciated by companies traditionally relying on reference standards.
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- Reference standards janmacek 2015-02-13 10:57 [Bioanalytics]
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Reference standards ElMaestro 2015-02-13 11:51
- OECD GLP Helmut 2015-02-13 14:13
- Reference standards Ionsource 2015-02-16 08:04
- Reference standards Ohlbe 2015-02-13 15:49
- Reference standards nobody 2015-02-13 19:22
- Reference standards ElMaestro 2015-02-13 23:00
- ....got a wicked idea ElMaestro 2015-02-13 23:18
- ....got a wicked idea nobody 2015-02-14 12:49
- ....got a wicked idea ElMaestro 2015-02-13 23:18
- Reference standards ElMaestro 2015-02-13 23:00
- Reference standards janmacek 2015-02-16 12:59
- Reference standards janmacek 2015-07-15 09:28
- "solved" ???ElMaestro 2015-07-15 10:35
- Reference standards janmacek 2015-07-15 09:28
- Reference standards nobody 2015-02-13 19:22
- Reference standards ElMaestro 2015-02-13 11:51
Ing. Helmut Schütz