The quantification of vitamins to determine bio­equi­valence [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Mauricio Sampaio  – Brazil, 2015-07-07 08:16 (3512 d 01:49 ago) – Posting: # 15046
Views: 3,130

Hi everyone!

Three studies compared diclofenac with the addition of B vitamins for low back pain.
  1. Kuhlwein A, Meyer HJ, Koehler CO. Reduced diclofenac administration by B vitamins: results of a randomized double-blind study with reduced daily doses of diclofenac (75 mg diclofenac versus 75 mg diclofenac plus B vitamins) in acute lumbar vertebral syndromes. Klin Wochenschr 1990; 68:107–15.

  2. Vetter G, Bruggemann G, Lettko M, et al. Shortening diclofenac therapy by B vitamins. Results of a randomized double-blind study, diclofenac 50 mg versus diclofenac 50 mg plus B vitamins, in painful spinal diseases with degenerative changes. Z Rheumatol 1988;47:351–62.

  3. Bruggemann G, Koehler CO, Koch EM. Results of a double-blind study of diclofenac + vitamin B1, B6, B12 versus diclofenac in patients with acute pain of the lumbar vertebrae. A multicenter study. Klin Wochenschr 1990; 68:116–20.
The authors of all 3 studies reported positive results for the combination therapy, although there were no statistically significant differences reported.

The authors concluded that there is conflicting evidence that an NSAID (diclofenac) plus B vitamins are more effective than diclofenac alone for acute low back pain, and limited evidence that B vitamins do not provide additional effect to an NSAID for chronic degenerative low back pain.

In this case, if the vitamins B are part of formulation of reference product, I have the questions below:
  1. I need to consider the quantification of vitamins in the bioequivalence study to prove that reference and test product are interchangeable? :confused:

  2. If you answered "YES" in the question above, I would like to know why? Note with previous information: "..there is conflicting evidence that an NSAID (diclofenac) plus B vitamins are more effective than diclofenac alone for acute low back pain, and limited evidence that B vitamins do not provide additional effect to an NSAID for chronic degenerative low back pain". Therefore, I think illogical to prove the bioequivalence of compounds that don't have trusty clinical evidences. :no:

  3. On the other hand, if I made a mistake in last conclusion above (iten 2), and Vitamins can be Actives Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API), can I apply the concept of BCS? In conclusion, the vitamins may be considered candidates for biowaivers? :confused:
If all above don't make a sense, please, inform or send to me the specific guidelines.

I wait any consideration.

Regards

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,381 posts in 4,914 threads, 1,664 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:05 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones.
But a collection of facts is no more a science
than a heap of stones is a house.    Henri Poincaré

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5