Degrees of freedom 3-period full replicate [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2015-07-06 13:10 (3270 d 04:25 ago) – Posting: # 15042
Views: 28,417

Dear Zizou!

Did you check the output from your SAS code against your degrees of freedom tables?

Here an example:
Scott Patterson and Byron Jones
"Bioequivalence and Statistics in Clinical Pharmacology"
Chapman and Hall/CRC Press: Boca Raton, London and New York, 2005

/*EXAMPLE 4.2*/
74 subjects, 3 periods, sequences TRR/RTT, unfortunately unbalanced with 35/39 subjects
PK metric Cmax without missings

Your SAS code according to the EMA crippled model with Proc GLM gives:
                   degrees of freedom
source                type I  type III
subject                73       72
  -sequence             1        0
  -subject(sequence)   72       72
period                  1        1
error                  34       34
total                 108      108

The type III df=0 for sequence or the changing df for subjects effects illustrates the typical mess with the EMA model.

Some differences to yours w.r.t. subject and total :cool:.

Fortunately the df's for the intra-subject variability of the reference don't play a role in the EMA recommended method for scaling of the BE acceptance ranges.

BTW: Your df's are correct for sequence balanced designs, if you use only the data for subjects with replicates of the Reference or if you evaluate via intra-subject contrasts like in the FDA recommended evaluation according to the progesterone guidance.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,057 posts in 4,840 threads, 1,641 registered users;
31 visitors (0 registered, 31 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You should treat as many patients as possible with the new drugs
while they still have the power to heal.    Armand Trousseau

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5