Degrees of freedom 3-period full replicate [RSABE / ABEL]
Dear Zizou!
Did you check the output from your SAS code against your degrees of freedom tables?
Here an example:
Scott Patterson and Byron Jones
"Bioequivalence and Statistics in Clinical Pharmacology"
Chapman and Hall/CRC Press: Boca Raton, London and New York, 2005
/*EXAMPLE 4.2*/
74 subjects, 3 periods, sequences TRR/RTT, unfortunately unbalanced with 35/39 subjects
PK metric Cmax without missings
Your SAS code according to the EMA crippled model with Proc GLM gives:
The type III df=0 for sequence or the changing df for subjects effects illustrates the typical mess with the EMA model.
Some differences to yours w.r.t. subject and total .
Fortunately the df's for the intra-subject variability of the reference don't play a role in the EMA recommended method for scaling of the BE acceptance ranges.
BTW: Your df's are correct for sequence balanced designs, if you use only the data for subjects with replicates of the Reference or if you evaluate via intra-subject contrasts like in the FDA recommended evaluation according to the progesterone guidance.
Did you check the output from your SAS code against your degrees of freedom tables?
Here an example:
Scott Patterson and Byron Jones
"Bioequivalence and Statistics in Clinical Pharmacology"
Chapman and Hall/CRC Press: Boca Raton, London and New York, 2005
/*EXAMPLE 4.2*/
74 subjects, 3 periods, sequences TRR/RTT, unfortunately unbalanced with 35/39 subjects
PK metric Cmax without missings
Your SAS code according to the EMA crippled model with Proc GLM gives:
degrees of freedom
source type I type III
subject 73 72
-sequence 1 0
-subject(sequence) 72 72
period 1 1
error 34 34
total 108 108
The type III df=0 for sequence or the changing df for subjects effects illustrates the typical mess with the EMA model.
Some differences to yours w.r.t. subject and total .
Fortunately the df's for the intra-subject variability of the reference don't play a role in the EMA recommended method for scaling of the BE acceptance ranges.
BTW: Your df's are correct for sequence balanced designs, if you use only the data for subjects with replicates of the Reference or if you evaluate via intra-subject contrasts like in the FDA recommended evaluation according to the progesterone guidance.
—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- 3 period full replicate Dr_Dan 2015-06-24 13:55 [RSABE / ABEL]
- 3 period full replicate ElMaestro 2015-06-24 14:11
- 3 period full replicate Helmut 2015-06-24 14:29
- 3 period full replicate d_labes 2015-06-24 14:38
- 3 period full replicate Dr_Dan 2015-06-24 16:43
- 3 period full replicate Helmut 2015-06-24 18:00
- 3 period full replicate ElMaestro 2015-06-24 18:11
- 3 period full replicate Helmut 2015-06-24 18:25
- 3 period full replicate d_labes 2015-06-25 08:52
- 3 period full replicate ElMaestro 2015-06-25 10:37
- 3 period full replicate d_labes 2015-06-25 08:52
- 3 period full replicate Helmut 2015-06-24 18:25
- 3 period full replicate ElMaestro 2015-06-24 18:11
- CVs (borderline OT) Helmut 2015-06-26 13:51
- CVs (R, T) from pooled CV d_labes 2015-07-02 09:09
- Answering an unasked question Helmut 2015-07-02 13:03
- Answer to an unasked answer d_labes 2015-07-02 14:21
- Bloody typo! Helmut 2015-07-02 14:33
- Answer to an unasked answer d_labes 2015-07-02 14:21
- Answering an unasked question Helmut 2015-07-02 13:03
- CVs (borderline OT) zizou 2015-07-05 19:20
- Degrees of freedom 3-period full replicated_labes 2015-07-06 11:10
- Degrees of freedom 3-period full replicate ElMaestro 2015-07-06 11:59
- Degrees of freedom 3-period full replicate d_labes 2015-07-06 13:53
- Degrees of freedom 3-period full replicate zizou 2015-07-06 17:25
- Degrees of freedom 3-period full replicate ElMaestro 2015-07-06 11:59
- Degrees of freedom 3-period full replicated_labes 2015-07-06 11:10
- CVs (R, T) from pooled CV d_labes 2015-07-02 09:09
- 3 period full replicate Helmut 2015-06-24 18:00
- 3 period full replicate Dr_Dan 2015-06-24 16:43
- The almighty oracle has spoken! Helmut 2015-07-23 23:54
- Almighty oracle's mysterious saying d_labes 2015-07-24 08:23