Acceptable difference (BE history) [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Dear Detlew,
I told Eric Ormsby at the last BioInternational conference (London, October 2008) that on the long run the mean of generic NTIDs will be \(\sqrt{0.900 \times 1.120} = 1.003992 \ldots\). IIRC he replied “We can stand that. 112% is just easier to remember.”…
When discussions were hot in the mid-1980s (switching from untransformed to log-transformed data) we had a width of the acceptance range of 0.40 (80–120%) based on an acceptable Δ of 0.20:
❝ ❝ critical dose drugs 90.0–112.0%).
❝
❝ Although this is a bit of generous rounding to one decimal
I told Eric Ormsby at the last BioInternational conference (London, October 2008) that on the long run the mean of generic NTIDs will be \(\sqrt{0.900 \times 1.120} = 1.003992 \ldots\). IIRC he replied “We can stand that. 112% is just easier to remember.”…
When discussions were hot in the mid-1980s (switching from untransformed to log-transformed data) we had a width of the acceptance range of 0.40 (80–120%) based on an acceptable Δ of 0.20:
- Some people proposed θ1 = 1–Δ (0.80) and θ2 = 1/θ1 (1.25) or ±ln(0.80).
- Others argued that with this method the AR in the original scale (0.45) will be wider than the previous standard (0.40). They suggested an even more conservative approach:
θ2 = 1+Δ (1.20) and θ1 = 1/θ1 (0.83) or ±ln(0.83).
- A minority suggested to modify Δ in such a way (to 0.1802…) that the AR keeps the previous width, i.e., to θ1 0.8198 and θ2 1.2198.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- HC Proposed Policy on Bioequivalence Standards for HVDS balakotu 2015-07-02 09:05 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- HC Proposed Policy on Bioequivalence Standards for HVDS d_labes 2015-07-02 09:19
- Bloody partial replicate again Helmut 2015-07-02 13:20
- Bloody partial replicate again Lucas 2015-07-02 13:35
- Which model? Helmut 2015-07-02 16:41
- Which model? Lucas 2015-07-02 18:06
- Which model? Helmut 2015-07-02 16:41
- Bloody partial replicate again Lucas 2015-07-02 13:35
- HC Proposed Policy on Bioequivalence Standards for HVDS drgunasakaran1 2015-07-02 17:08
- AUC and Cmax Helmut 2015-07-02 17:37
- HC for HVDs d_labes 2015-07-03 08:21
- HC for HVDs Helmut 2015-07-03 11:55
- Rounding d_labes 2015-07-03 12:53
- Acceptable difference (BE history)Helmut 2015-07-03 14:49
- Off topic ElMaestro 2015-07-03 13:02
- Playing around with α (not exactly brilliant) Helmut 2015-07-03 15:38
- Playing around with α (not exactly brilliant) ElMaestro 2015-07-03 16:35
- Playing around with α (not exactly brilliant) Helmut 2015-07-03 16:44
- OT – Philosophers on duty d_labes 2015-07-03 21:11
- Playing around with α (not exactly brilliant) Helmut 2015-07-03 16:44
- Playing around with α (not exactly brilliant) ElMaestro 2015-07-03 16:35
- Playing around with α (not exactly brilliant) Helmut 2015-07-03 15:38
- Rounding d_labes 2015-07-03 12:53
- HC for HVDs Helmut 2015-07-03 11:55