3 period full replicate [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2015-06-25 10:52 (3250 d 04:41 ago) – Posting: # 14983
Views: 28,918

Dear Helmut et al.

I think it's a waste of time to discuss this bizarre opinion of a "leading European regulatory authority" in detail.
Scientifically there is IMHO not a single argument to underpin this opinion.
All details in Dan's quote are simply not true. Full stop.

Unfortunately it seems that scientific arguments don't play a big role in some regulators "opinions". And much, much more unfortunately regulators don't have to justify their judgements :crying:.

So what's left? Your tip: "Don’t select them as a RMS!"
Another possibility would be to reactivate our Ol' pirate as a regulator :-D

BTW: The handling of the Concept paper on HVDs/HVDPs is revealing ...

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,029 posts in 4,834 threads, 1,641 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The most erroneous stories are those we think we know best–
and therefore never scrutinize or question.    Stephen Jay Gould

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5