Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Hypotheses in non-inferiority trials

Hypotheses in non-inferiority trials [Power / Sample Size]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2015-06-18 12:17 (3560 d 04:39 ago) – Posting: # 14966
Views: 9,603

Dear Outlaw

❝ ... Am I misinterpreting these kind of statements? Are they valid?

As far as I understand that statement: It must be from or leftover from the ancient times where non-inferiority trials or equivalence trials where tried to evaluate via the "normal" statistical tests (for non-equality) but setting alpha and beta errors reversed. I.e. high alpha, low beta, f.i. alpha=0.2, beta=0.05.

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

The power of post hoc power The Outlaw Torn 2015-05-13 12:49 [Power / Sample Size]
- The power of post hoc power ElMaestro 2015-05-13 17:53
  - Ad hoc power d_labes 2015-05-13 20:18
    - Ad hoc power The Outlaw Torn 2015-05-14 11:38
      - Ad hoc power The Outlaw Torn 2015-06-15 11:20
        
        Hypotheses in non-inferiority trials mittyri 2015-06-16 21:52
        
        Hypotheses in non-inferiority trials The Outlaw Torn 2015-06-17 11:35
        
        Hypotheses in non-inferiority trialsd_labes 2015-06-18 10:17
        
        Hypotheses in non-inferiority trials The Outlaw Torn 2015-06-22 10:23
        
        Hypotheses in non-inferiority trials arjunroy 2015-06-29 08:24