Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • SAS OT

SAS OT [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2015-06-12 17:32 (3571 d 14:03 ago) – Posting: # 14952
Views: 14,343

Dear ElMaestro,

regarding your signature I have an addition:

Why? Because SAS says so. And SAS is validated.
Per se. Of course without any user attempts to show that it does what it should be.

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

R code for lm.mod does not make sense dmfisher 2015-06-09 03:55 [🇷 for BE/BA]
- R code for lm.mod does not make sense yjlee168 2015-06-09 17:57
  - R code for lm.mod does not make sense ElMaestro 2015-06-09 21:07
    - R code for lm.mod does not make sense yjlee168 2015-06-10 11:34
      - R code for lm.mod does not make sense ElMaestro 2015-06-10 14:22
        
        R code for lm.mod does not make sense yjlee168 2015-06-11 09:44
        
        Reference datasets Helmut 2015-06-11 11:50
        
        Reference datasets ElMaestro 2015-06-11 12:01
        
        Reference datasets yjlee168 2015-06-11 22:16
        Type III kuddel muddel d_labes 2015-06-12 09:04
        
        Type III kuddel muddel Helmut 2015-06-12 11:27
        
        ANOVA F-test results and regulators d_labes 2015-06-12 15:23
        
        ANOVA F-test results and regulators ElMaestro 2015-06-12 15:29
        
        ANOVA F-test results and regulators d_labes 2015-06-12 15:44
        
        ANOVA F-test results and regulators ElMaestro 2015-06-12 15:52
        
        Type III again ElMaestro 2015-06-12 12:18
        
        SAS OTd_labes 2015-06-12 15:32
        
        Reference datasets yjlee168 2015-06-11 19:56
        Test hypothesis of using Type I/III MS... yjlee168 2015-06-12 09:01
  - R code for lm.mod does not make sense dmfisher 2015-06-10 01:38