LLOQ/2 for BQLs not suggested [PK / PD]
Dear all,
just found an interesting statement in an EPAR of 2013:
just found an interesting statement in an EPAR of 2013:
The CHMP raised questions about the appropriateness of calculations using below limit of quantitation (BLQ) and exclusion of data. The applicant provided re-evaluated PK parameters and statistical analysis not replacing BLQ with the half value of lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ).
(my emphasis)—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- LLOQ/2 for BQLs not suggestedHelmut 2015-06-08 12:35 [PK / PD]
- Zero suggested? d_labes 2015-06-08 13:31
- Interpolate? Helmut 2015-06-08 14:02
- Impute? ElMaestro 2015-06-08 14:37
- "embedded BLOQ" aka "triangular points" d_labes 2015-06-08 14:51
- Interpolate? Helmut 2015-06-08 14:02
- Zero suggested? d_labes 2015-06-08 13:31