ANVISA: scABEL TIE [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2015-06-03 13:59 (3615 d 18:58 ago) – Posting: # 14899
Views: 9,653

Dear Helmut!

❝ Reading ANVISA’s response over and over again, I gather that they mean #1 in order to be on the safe side (“EMA accepts reference-scaling for five years now. Let’s be slightly more con­ser­va­tive.”). At least some of the inflation of the Type I Error observed with EMA’s “method” vanishes (I expect still a TIE of ~0.06 at 40%). Until Detlew releases an (experimental?) update for PowerTOST’s *.scABEL functions (regulator="ANVISA") one can only assume the worst in sample size estimation, i.e., unscaled ABE, theta0=0.9, CV=0.4


PowerTOST V1.2-07 is on the way.
First impression concerning TIE (n=24, nsims=1E6):
    CV   theta0      TIE
 0.250  1.250000 0.050508
 0.275  1.250000 0.050839
 0.300  1.250000 0.053183
 0.325  1.250000 0.061220
 0.350  1.250000 0.078676
 0.375  1.250000 0.105438
 0.400  1.250000 0.137350
 0.4001 1.340322 0.039371
 0.425  1.363072 0.039987
 0.450  1.385991 0.038561
 0.475  1.408971 0.035537
 0.500  1.431997 0.031668
 0.525  1.431997 0.036341
 0.550  1.431997 0.040046
 0.575  1.431997 0.042868
 0.600  1.431997 0.044908

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,667 registered users;
28 visitors (0 registered, 28 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is true that many scientists are not philosophically minded
and have hitherto shown much skill and ingenuity
but little wisdom.    Max Born

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5