Does unequal alpha distribution make sense? [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2015-05-19 10:29 (3596 d 06:49 ago) – Posting: # 14853
Views: 21,902

Dear all
There are some People who recommend to use a very small alpha in the first stage and a large alpha in the next.

Stage I:  0.001 leading to 99.8% CI
Stage II: 0.049 leading to 90.2% CI

Chance of approval in the first go is low, but you will have a comfortable CI in the second stage. However, as I learned from our famous captain, it is almost impossible to argue that it makes a practical difference. Do you agree or disagree? What is your experience?
Looking forward to your valuable input
Kind regards
Dr_Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,669 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:19 CET (Europe/Vienna)

An expert is one who knows more and more
about less and less.    Nicholas Murray Butler

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5