Proc Mixed for >2 treatments [Software]

posted by H_Rotter – Germany, 2008-01-08 14:20 (6742 d 14:03 ago) – Posting: # 1480
Views: 14,828

Hi Matz!

❝ Hai All

  ^^ -- that's German for 'shark' :hungry:

❝ Anybody please tell me what is the advantage of using Proc MIXED insted of Proc GLM in the SAS program, for the analysis of bioequivalence studies with missing values (subjects not completed some periods).


See this post by Jaime and Helmut's as well.
So if you have more than two treatments in your study you may use Proc MIXED.
In a 2×2 study you will get the same results - but Proc MIXED is more time consuming (iterative instead of explicit).

❝ Is it required to specify in the protocol that which procedure (GLM or MIXED) is use for the statistical analysis.


IMHO that's a good idea. Simply specify it as a decision tree:
No drop-outs (complete data from all periods) → Proc GLM
Drop-outs (incomplete data) → Proc MIXED

Regards,
Hermann

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
113 visitors (0 registered, 113 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5