PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-04-22 18:41 (3588 d 01:56 ago) – Posting: # 14733
Views: 12,119

Hi John,

❝ ❝ VSL’s post is ambiguous:


❝ And guess what, he still hasn't replied :-|


❝ But if he was talking about ref scaled, then why would he bring up 90 CI? Strange, actually scary...


Duno. That’s why I asked for more information. He/she didn’t mention a 90% CI, only told us

❝ Study is passed in CI


Maybe he/she meant the upper 95% CL of FDA’s approach (≤0)? BTW, since for the EMA scaling is capped at CVWR 50% passing with a 90% CI and failing on the PE is very, very unlikely.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,381 posts in 4,914 threads, 1,663 registered users;
41 visitors (0 registered, 41 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:37 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones.
But a collection of facts is no more a science
than a heap of stones is a house.    Henri Poincaré

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5