PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects [Study Assessment]
Hi Helmut,
And guess what, he still hasn't replied
But if he was talking about ref scaled, then why would he bring up 90 CI? Strange, actually scary...
John
❝ VSL’s post is ambiguous:
And guess what, he still hasn't replied

But if he was talking about ref scaled, then why would he bring up 90 CI? Strange, actually scary...
John
Complete thread:
- Study Results VSL 2015-04-20 21:46 [Study Assessment]
- Study Results ElMaestro 2015-04-20 23:47
- upper CL < PE Helmut 2015-04-21 00:39
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects Helmut 2015-04-21 00:24
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects jag009 2015-04-21 16:49
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects Helmut 2015-04-21 17:12
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effectsjag009 2015-04-22 15:47
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs Helmut 2015-04-22 16:41
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effectsjag009 2015-04-22 15:47
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects Helmut 2015-04-21 17:12
- GMR outside the limits when using ABEL Averroes 2017-05-19 11:53
- Regulations ≠ Science Helmut 2017-05-19 14:07
- Regulations ≠ Science Averroes 2017-05-22 20:51
- Regulations ≠ Science Helmut 2017-05-19 14:07
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects jag009 2015-04-21 16:49
- Study Results ElMaestro 2015-04-20 23:47