PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-04-21 19:12 (3587 d 10:32 ago) – Posting: # 14729
Views: 12,392

Hi John,

❝ You guys are messing with me... If the T/R Ratio is <0.8 or >1.25, how can you generate a 90 CI that is within 80.00 – 125.00 since the 90% CI consists of (PE ± values)?


If we are dealing with unscaled ABE, ElMaestro’s answer (and your doubt) is correct: No way.

VSL’s post is ambiguous:

❝ Study is passed in CI but mean T/R ratio is not within the 0.80-1.25.


If the study was reference-scaled, the (implied) BE limits may be much wider (my answer).
Example in FDA’s flavor: CVWR 60%, implied limits 60.96–164.04%, CI 97.00–162.00%; would pass (CI within limits), but fail due to the PE of 125.36 >125.00%.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,380 posts in 4,914 threads, 1,665 registered users;
82 visitors (0 registered, 82 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:44 CET (Europe/Vienna)

When people learn no tools of judgment
and merely follow their hopes,
the seeds of political manipulation are sown.    Stephen Jay Gould

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5