lme() with NA in R [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2015-04-20 01:44 (3714 d 23:11 ago) – Posting: # 14710
Views: 29,604

Dear Elmaestro and Helmut,

I like to correct what I have said about lme() with NA. We can use lme(..., na.action=na.exclude) if there are some NA in dataset. Looks like this option can avoid crash if we do not omit NA. Sounds great.

any NA must be removed (as the entire period) first before doing lme(); otherwise, it will crash.[/list] So there is no way to compare the difference.


All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5