LL and AIC [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-04-19 13:08 (3715 d 11:57 ago) – Posting: # 14707
Views: 29,172

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ You're right, it does look surprising.


Since Gnumeric is my (non-)pocket calculator (no modeling!) I concur that PHX’ results are the “correct” ones.

❝ Can you ask Phoenix what the log likelihood was when it had identified the minimum and compare with Yung-jin's logLik above?


Maybe it’s better to look at the AIC (lower = better)
               AIC       LL
bear          -174.2564  98.12818
PHX Method A   -29.0235  33.51175
PHX Method B   -54.8339  35.41696
PHX Method C  -190.0907 106.04533


❝ And what about those DF's?


Identical.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
39 visitors (0 registered, 39 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5