LL and AIC [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-04-19 13:08 (4077 d 17:31 ago) – Posting: # 14707
Views: 32,717

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ You're right, it does look surprising.


Since Gnumeric is my (non-)pocket calculator (no modeling!) I concur that PHX’ results are the “correct” ones.

❝ Can you ask Phoenix what the log likelihood was when it had identified the minimum and compare with Yung-jin's logLik above?


Maybe it’s better to look at the AIC (lower = better)
               AIC       LL
bear          -174.2564  98.12818
PHX Method A   -29.0235  33.51175
PHX Method B   -54.8339  35.41696
PHX Method C  -190.0907 106.04533


❝ And what about those DF's?


Identical.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
159 visitors (0 registered, 159 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5