LL and AIC [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-04-19 13:08 (3660 d 07:42 ago) – Posting: # 14707
Views: 28,676

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ You're right, it does look surprising.


Since Gnumeric is my (non-)pocket calculator (no modeling!) I concur that PHX’ results are the “correct” ones.

❝ Can you ask Phoenix what the log likelihood was when it had identified the minimum and compare with Yung-jin's logLik above?


Maybe it’s better to look at the AIC (lower = better)
               AIC       LL
bear          -174.2564  98.12818
PHX Method A   -29.0235  33.51175
PHX Method B   -54.8339  35.41696
PHX Method C  -190.0907 106.04533


❝ And what about those DF's?


Identical.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
11 visitors (0 registered, 11 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A drug is that substance which, when injected into a rat,
will produce a scientific report.    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5