Mean means [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2015-04-19 11:14 (4076 d 17:24 ago) – Posting: # 14706
Views: 32,929

Hi Helmut,

                                  R        T

❝ Method A (EMA, subjects fixed)   7.328141 7.391880

❝ Method B (EMA, subjects random)  7.328141 7.391880

❝ Method C (FDA = mixed efects)    7.328141 7.391880

❝ Marginal means (Gnumeric)        7.328141 7.391880

❝ So why do we get…

bear                             7.356274 7.420013

❝ … which are ~3.8% higher for both treatments? No, I’m not satisfied if only the PE agrees – I expect to get a nasty surprise once we start to deal with un­ba­lanced data.


You're right, it does look surprising.
Can you ask Phoenix what the log likelihood was when it had identified the minimum and compare with Yung-jin's logLik above?

And what about those DF's?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
197 visitors (0 registered, 197 guests [including 81 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5