Dataset [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-04-18 15:30 (3716 d 07:05 ago) – Posting: # 14700
Views: 29,682

Dear Yung-jin,

❝ do we use the same dataset? :confused:


I’m using bear’s SingleRep_stat_demo.csv (to confirm my numbers see above). I worked with the raw-data and made the log-transformation internally in full precision.
In the dataset lnCmax is given with two decimal figures. If I use those I get R 7.3261, T 7.3900, PE 0.0639.

Seems that there are also some rounding issues in part of the data:
subj drug seq prd Cmax lnCmax round(log(Cmax), 2)
1     1    2   3  1700   7.43   7.44
2     1    1   4  1461   7.28   7.29
3     1    2   3  1790   7.48   7.49
4     2    1   3  1619   7.38   7.39
4     1    1   4  1364   7.21   7.22
6     1    1   4  1746   7.46   7.47
8     1    1   4  1949   7.57   7.58
9     2    2   4  1769   7.47   7.48
10    2    1   3  1493   7.30   7.31
11    1    2   3  1117   7.01   7.02
12    2    1   3  1257   7.13   7.14
13    1    2   3  1245   7.12   7.13
13    2    2   4  1615   7.38   7.39


… leading to R 7.3289, T 7.3918, PE 0.0629.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
47 visitors (0 registered, 47 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5