Bug in bear? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2015-04-14 22:43 (4081 d 06:47 ago) – Posting: # 14688
Views: 33,712

Guten Abend!

❝ Bad news: Something seems to be strange in bear.


I'm a little bit surprised. No validation was performed for replicate design? I've found the validation report only for 2X2X2 crossover (dated 2009)
I know that some companies use Bear for BE estimation during the registration procedure. No statistical validation after installation?

❝ The dataset looks artificial to me – in most cases exactly ±10 in the respective periods…


The author of the package mentioned that these demo sets aren't artificial

Kind regards,
Mittyri
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
165 visitors (0 registered, 165 guests [including 48 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5