Bug in bear? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2015-04-14 22:43 (3719 d 23:49 ago) – Posting: # 14688
Views: 30,219

Guten Abend!

❝ Bad news: Something seems to be strange in bear.


I'm a little bit surprised. No validation was performed for replicate design? I've found the validation report only for 2X2X2 crossover (dated 2009)
I know that some companies use Bear for BE estimation during the registration procedure. No statistical validation after installation?

❝ The dataset looks artificial to me – in most cases exactly ±10 in the respective periods…


The author of the package mentioned that these demo sets aren't artificial

Kind regards,
Mittyri
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
59 visitors (0 registered, 59 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5