Baseline correction [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-04-07 17:30 (3726 d 19:59 ago) – Posting: # 14672
Views: 10,756

❝ Mr Schuetz!


Mr Teixeira! :-D

❝ ❝ Yes, but that’s a different story. If the measured concentration equals the baseline, you get after subtraction a “true” zero. Such values are valid and should be used. If C <LLOQ then force it to zero.

❝

❝ When the corrected concentration results in a negative value it makes no sense IMHO, …


What do you suggest instead?

❝ … and they ask us to force this point to zero...


I have given up monitoring ANVISA’s website, but we find such a statement in numerous of FDA’s guidances (e.g., ergocalciferol):

We recommend that applicants mea­sure and approximate the baseline endogenous levels in blood (plasma) and subtract these levels from the total concentrations mea­sured from each subject after the drug product is administered. In this way, you can achieve an estimate of BE of the products.
If a baseline correction results in a negative plasma concentration value, the value should be set equal to 0 before calculating the baseline-corrected AUC. […] Deter­mi­nation of BE should be based on the baseline-corrected data.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,677 registered users;
43 visitors (0 registered, 43 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5