S×F vari­­ance: Follow­up [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2015-02-21 22:08 (4145 d 06:40 ago) – Posting: # 14487
Views: 43,064

Hi Angus,

I won't be seeing him until March. I will definitely ask him about this.
He took a look at the Proc Mixed G-Matrix route to get within subject T, R and I, but he didn't comment in details. He did say the #s can be obtained from that route.

I just don't like the wordings FDA stated in the draft guidance. It looks like an open ended question -> "Q2D has an allowance of 0.03". They want us to present both Q2D and 95% UBC, but the ending statement seems to indicate that they want to see Q2D no more than 0.03 rather than both Q2D and 95% UCB no more than 0.03. They need some sort of English 101 training???

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
261 visitors (0 registered, 261 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5