Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Gimmick & survey [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by nobody – 2015-02-20 15:18 (3349 d 17:53 ago) – Posting: # 14472
Views: 11,581

Hi from nowhere!

❝ Potvin’s adjusted α of 0.0294 for both methods was unfortunate. “Type 2” always needs more ad­just­ment than “type 1”. I used the optimized values of 0.0303 and 0.0282. No significant inflation of the TIE (maxima 0.05015 and 0.05010).

Clever!

❝ ...and running the simulations took me close to two months.

Sorry for OT again, but I heard that all the "for..." constructions are not so effective in R and better to use vectors for all "for ...to" and calculate them. Have you any experience on this?

(Read the R developers are thinking about an API for distributed computing. so we can share all our machines for large simulations )

Complete thread:

• Gimmick & survey Helmut 2015-02-20 01:47 
  • Gimmick & survey nobody 2015-02-20 08:25
    • Gimmick & survey Helmut 2015-02-20 13:01
      • Gimmick & surveynobody 2015-02-20 14:18
        • Speeed! Helmut 2015-02-20 15:38
          • Speeed! nobody 2015-02-20 16:37
            • Speeed! Helmut 2015-02-20 16:58
              • Speeed! nobody 2015-02-20 17:01
          • Speeed! ElMaestro 2015-02-20 23:48
            • Speeed! Helmut 2015-02-21 01:11
              • Unrolled example ElMaestro 2015-02-21 01:32
                • Unrolled example Helmut 2015-02-21 01:50
                  • Unrolled example ElMaestro 2015-02-21 02:27
                    • Increasing vector & another example Helmut 2015-02-21 13:13
              • Speeed! nobody 2015-02-21 21:02