Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Partial credit [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2015-02-11 16:49 (4151 d 03:30 ago) – Posting: # 14406
Views: 16,211

Hi d_labes and Hötzi,

at least we should give TFS partial credit because they acknowledge the existence of the issue and they are doing something about it. They could have decided to keep silent about it and do nuffin. No big deal. After all, only 0.0000000000000000000000001 (plusminus 10) % of the studies submitted for approval are evaluated with Kinetica

Life is beautiful.

Complete thread:

• Montelukast BE study rahul dixit 2011-01-03 15:17 [Design Issues] 
  • Montelukast BE study bjkim97 2011-01-06 06:45
    • Opinions ... d_labes 2011-01-07 13:51
      • Opinions ... bjkim97 2011-01-11 06:47
    • Montelukast BE study joy_fm 2015-02-05 13:10
      • MHRA’s PARs Helmut 2015-02-05 13:24
        • MHRA’s PARs joy_fm 2015-02-10 17:38
          • CV from the CI Helmut 2015-02-11 02:05
            • CI2CV d_labes 2015-02-11 09:16
              • Beyond the abstract Helmut 2015-02-11 13:01
                • Beyond the abstract ElMaestro 2015-02-11 13:36
                  • Beyond the abstract & Kinetica Helmut 2015-02-11 14:27
                    • Beyond the abstract & Kinetica d_labes 2015-02-11 14:59
                      • Partial creditElMaestro 2015-02-11 15:49
                        • Partial credit ioanam 2016-01-22 14:17
                          • Partial credit ElMaestro 2016-01-22 14:58
                            • Partial credit Helmut 2016-01-22 15:06