S×F vari­­ance: Followup [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2015-02-02 17:31 (3368 d 00:09 ago) – Posting: # 14354
Views: 38,276

Angus,

❝ John: You have 71 subjects (69 df) for Wt: I have 69 subjects (67 df) ......the 2 subjects you include in SAS and I exclude in Phoenix are 24 and 31. So the question arises what are the rules in your code that allow you to include them in SAS.


Before we proceed. Are you in agreement with my subject listing for Dlatr and ilat? I looked at Dlatt (wt) listing and the SAS dataset and noted the following:

Subject 24 only has TTR (missing one R), and subject 31 has RTT (missing one R). Why would Winnonlin drop these two subjects? Both have 2 Ts and hence Dlatt should've been calculated just like the rest of the qualified subjects.

John

P.S. I am still waiting for Helmut's response the H and u calculations...

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,649 registered users;
76 visitors (2 registered, 74 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5