S×F vari­­ance: Followup [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2015-02-02 17:31 (3802 d 18:05 ago) – Posting: # 14354
Views: 41,137

Angus,

❝ John: You have 71 subjects (69 df) for Wt: I have 69 subjects (67 df) ......the 2 subjects you include in SAS and I exclude in Phoenix are 24 and 31. So the question arises what are the rules in your code that allow you to include them in SAS.


Before we proceed. Are you in agreement with my subject listing for Dlatr and ilat? I looked at Dlatt (wt) listing and the SAS dataset and noted the following:

Subject 24 only has TTR (missing one R), and subject 31 has RTT (missing one R). Why would Winnonlin drop these two subjects? Both have 2 Ts and hence Dlatt should've been calculated just like the rest of the qualified subjects.

John

P.S. I am still waiting for Helmut's response the H and u calculations...

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,679 registered users;
50 visitors (0 registered, 50 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No problem can stand the assault of sustained thinking.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5