S×F variance: Followup [General Statistics]
❝ I pulled these counts off the SAS computational datasets (ilat, dlat for test, dlat for reference) which show the # of subjects used for each computation. You can use this to check and see if Winnonlin used the same subjects per computation?
❝
❝ Dlatt(for computation of Wt)
❝ subject 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31
❝ 32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60
❝ 62,63,64,65,66,68,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78
John: You have 71 subjects (69 df) for Wt: I have 69 subjects (67 df) ......the 2 subjects you include in SAS and I exclude in Phoenix are 24 and 31. So the question arises what are the rules in your code that allow you to include them in SAS.
Excluding then in Phoenix follows the code in Phoenix.
Angus
Complete thread:
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 15:32 [General Statistics]
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 16:32
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 17:17
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-28 23:12
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 17:17
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 20:56
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-23 23:07
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 01:39
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-24 16:21
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 17:50
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-24 16:21
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-06 17:30
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-08 22:42
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-09 01:44
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-12 16:53
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-12 20:56
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion Helmut 2015-01-13 01:25
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-13 20:13
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-14 21:29
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-29 23:38
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion Helmut 2015-01-13 01:25
- S×F variance: FollowupAngusMcLean 2015-01-30 23:24
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-02 16:31
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-02 17:22
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-05 18:14
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 01:39
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-06 17:13
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 19:36
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-17 22:49
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-19 23:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-21 21:08
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-22 17:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-23 16:58
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-22 17:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-21 21:08
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-19 23:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-17 22:49
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 19:36
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-05 18:14
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-02 17:22
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-02 16:31
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-12 20:56
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-12 16:53
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-09 01:44
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-08 22:42
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 01:39
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-06 18:48
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-07 21:28
- S×F variance Helmut 2015-01-08 16:10
- S×F variance: Typo. jag009 2015-01-08 17:32
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 18:51
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:02
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 20:27
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:33
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 20:27
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:02
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 18:51
- S×F variance: Typo. jag009 2015-01-08 17:32
- S×F variance Helmut 2015-01-08 16:10
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-07 21:28
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 16:32