α vs. 1–α [General Statistics]
Hi Helmut,
Yours:
Mine from SAS:
Looks like we are different for H and U values and the culprit lies within H.
Here are my equations for H's:
Please see my previous post on the X2 statements for Wi, Wt and Wt. The n-s is different per equation(right?). df_it = DF for i, dfdt = DF for t, dfdr = DF for r. Maybe I am wrong (or you?)?
John
Yours:
❝ Eq Hq Uq
❝ E1 0.165897781 H1 0.232840079 U1 0.004481271
❝ E2 -0.058269837 H2 -0.046281491 U2 0.000143720
❝ E3 -0.099656775 H3 -0.072837204 U3 0.000719289
Mine from SAS:
Eq Hq Uq
E1 0.1658977807 H1 0.2260910911 U1 0.0036232346
E2 -0.058269837 H2 -0.044977787 U2 0.0001766786
E3 -0.099656775 H3 -0.077185694 U3 0.0005049495
Looks like we are different for H and U values and the culprit lies within H.
Here are my equations for H's:
H_1=(df_it*s2wi)/chi_wi;
H_2=(-0.5*dfdt*s2wt)/chi_wt;
H_3=(-0.5*dfdr*s2wr)/chi_wr;
Please see my previous post on the X2 statements for Wi, Wt and Wt. The n-s is different per equation(right?). df_it = DF for i, dfdt = DF for t, dfdr = DF for r. Maybe I am wrong (or you?)?
John
Complete thread:
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 15:32 [General Statistics]
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 16:32
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 17:17
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-28 23:12
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 17:17
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 20:56
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-23 23:07
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 01:39
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-24 16:21
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 17:50
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-24 16:21
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-06 17:30
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-08 22:42
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-09 01:44
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-12 16:53
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-12 20:56
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion Helmut 2015-01-13 01:25
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-13 20:13
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-14 21:29
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion jag009 2015-01-14 23:00
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-29 23:38
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion Helmut 2015-01-13 01:25
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-30 23:24
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-02 16:31
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-02 17:22
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-05 18:14
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 01:39
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-06 17:13
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 19:36
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-17 22:49
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-19 23:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-21 21:08
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-22 17:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-23 16:58
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-22 17:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-21 21:08
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-19 23:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-17 22:49
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 19:36
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-05 18:14
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-02 17:22
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-02 16:31
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-12 20:56
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-12 16:53
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-09 01:44
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-08 22:42
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 01:39
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-06 18:48
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-07 21:28
- S×F variance Helmut 2015-01-08 16:10
- S×F variance: Typo. jag009 2015-01-08 17:32
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 18:51
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:02
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 20:27
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:33
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 20:27
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:02
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 18:51
- S×F variance: Typo. jag009 2015-01-08 17:32
- S×F variance Helmut 2015-01-08 16:10
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-07 21:28
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 16:32