α vs. 1–α [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2015-01-19 17:02 (3821 d 07:32 ago) – Posting: # 14303
Views: 41,909

Hi Helmut,

Yours:

Eq               Hq              Uq

E1  0.165897781  H1  0.232840079  U1 0.004481271

E2 -0.058269837  H2 -0.046281491  U2 0.000143720

E3 -0.099656775  H3 -0.072837204  U3 0.000719289


Mine from SAS:
       Eq               Hq              Uq
E1  0.1658977807 H1 0.2260910911  U1 0.0036232346
E2 -0.058269837  H2 -0.044977787  U2 0.0001766786
E3 -0.099656775  H3 -0.077185694  U3 0.0005049495


Looks like we are different for H and U values and the culprit lies within H.

Here are my equations for H's:

H_1=(df_it*s2wi)/chi_wi;
H_2=(-0.5*dfdt*s2wt)/chi_wt;
H_3=(-0.5*dfdr*s2wr)/chi_wr;


Please see my previous post on the X2 statements for Wi, Wt and Wt. The n-s is different per equation(right?). df_it = DF for i, dfdt = DF for t, dfdr = DF for r. Maybe I am wrong (or you?)?

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,679 registered users;
33 visitors (0 registered, 33 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5