α vs. 1–α [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-01-15 01:54 (3821 d 10:01 ago) – Posting: # 14292
Views: 42,344

Hi John,

❝ You guys have fun. That's why I like SAS more. I have more control (but most of the time less control!!) :-D


I think all these systems (SAS, PHX, R) can be nasty beasts. They love to be treated carefully and hate quick-shots. What I missed:

[image]

For H2/H3 1–α (like in RSABE), but for H1 α… Dammit!

What I have so far:

σ²D 0.007971169

    Eq               Hq              Uq
E1  0.165897781  H1  0.232840079  U1 0.004481271
E2 -0.058269837  H2 -0.046281491  U2 0.000143720
E3 -0.099656775  H3 -0.072837204  U3 0.000719289
Eq 0.007971169                  ∑Uq 0.005344281

Hσ²D = 0.007971169 + √0.005344281 = 0.081075759


My 0.081075759 ≠ your 0.073582621. What a mess!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,679 registered users;
32 visitors (0 registered, 32 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No problem can stand the assault of sustained thinking.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5