S×F vari­­ance: Followup [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2015-01-12 21:56 (4177 d 05:58 ago) – Posting: # 14272
Views: 45,631

❝ ❝ That is what I have. Please can you check?


❝ I pulled these counts off the SAS computational datasets (ilat, dlat for test, dlat for reference) which show the # of subjects used for each computation. You can use this to check and see if Winnonlin used the same subjects per computation?


MT
No; it did not Phoenix has 69 pairs used for data analysis and 9 subjects missing(11,20,61,67, 69,71, 42, 31 and 24.) My avoe mesage is in error. For SAS you have 24 and 31 retained compared with Phoenix. So you have 71 subjects n the calculation.

Dlatt(for computation of Wt)

subject 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31

32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,

59,60

62,63,64,65,66,68,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78


Dlatr(for computation of Wr)

subject 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30

32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60

62,63,64,65,66,68,69,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78


Ilat(for computation of Wi)

subject 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30,32,33

34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,62,63,64,65

66,68,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78


Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
136 visitors (0 registered, 136 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5