S×F vari­­ance: Followup [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2015-01-12 17:53 (4177 d 23:47 ago) – Posting: # 14271
Views: 45,902

Hi Angus,

❝ That is what I have. Please can you check?


I pulled these counts off the SAS computational datasets (ilat, dlat for test, dlat for reference) which show the # of subjects used for each computation. You can use this to check and see if Winnonlin used the same subjects per computation?

Dlatt(for computation of Wt)
subject 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31
32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60
62,63,64,65,66,68,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78

Dlatr(for computation of Wr)
subject 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30
32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60
62,63,64,65,66,68,69,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78

Ilat(for computation of Wi)
subject 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30,32,33
34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,62,63,64,65
66,68,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78


John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
143 visitors (0 registered, 143 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5