S×F variance: Followup [General Statistics]
John: Thanks for the update. I did not count missing subjects. The number of subjects who completed both R1 and R2 =73 for the full replicate data set.
I checked it three times. I did not use the subject numbers in the rows. I used the row numbers (this takes into account missing subject numbers). The subjects are numbered 1 to 78, but there are only 73 rows of subjects in the study.
The number of subjects who completed T1 and T2=69 subjects. {Four subjects missed a treatment with T2}.
So the number of degrees of freedom for R and T is 71 and 67, respectively.
That is what I have. Please can you check?
Angus
I checked it three times. I did not use the subject numbers in the rows. I used the row numbers (this takes into account missing subject numbers). The subjects are numbered 1 to 78, but there are only 73 rows of subjects in the study.
The number of subjects who completed T1 and T2=69 subjects. {Four subjects missed a treatment with T2}.
So the number of degrees of freedom for R and T is 71 and 67, respectively.
That is what I have. Please can you check?
Angus
Complete thread:
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 15:32 [General Statistics]
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 16:32
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 17:17
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-28 23:12
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 17:17
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 20:56
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-23 23:07
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 01:39
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-24 16:21
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 17:50
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-24 16:21
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-06 17:30
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-08 22:42
- S×F variance: FollowupAngusMcLean 2015-01-09 01:44
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-12 16:53
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-12 20:56
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion Helmut 2015-01-13 01:25
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-13 20:13
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-14 21:29
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-29 23:38
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion Helmut 2015-01-13 01:25
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-30 23:24
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-02 16:31
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-02 17:22
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-05 18:14
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 01:39
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-06 17:13
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 19:36
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-17 22:49
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-19 23:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-21 21:08
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-22 17:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-23 16:58
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-22 17:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-21 21:08
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-19 23:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-17 22:49
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 19:36
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-05 18:14
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-02 17:22
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-02 16:31
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-12 20:56
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-12 16:53
- S×F variance: FollowupAngusMcLean 2015-01-09 01:44
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-08 22:42
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 01:39
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-06 18:48
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-07 21:28
- S×F variance Helmut 2015-01-08 16:10
- S×F variance: Typo. jag009 2015-01-08 17:32
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 18:51
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:02
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 20:27
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:33
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 20:27
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:02
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 18:51
- S×F variance: Typo. jag009 2015-01-08 17:32
- S×F variance Helmut 2015-01-08 16:10
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-07 21:28
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 16:32