S×F vari­­ance: Followup [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2015-01-09 02:44 (4181 d 05:20 ago) – Posting: # 14264
Views: 45,791

John: Thanks for the update. I did not count missing subjects. The number of subjects who completed both R1 and R2 =73 for the full replicate data set.

I checked it three times. I did not use the subject numbers in the rows. I used the row numbers (this takes into account missing subject numbers). The subjects are numbered 1 to 78, but there are only 73 rows of subjects in the study.

The number of subjects who completed T1 and T2=69 subjects. {Four subjects missed a treatment with T2}.

So the number of degrees of freedom for R and T is 71 and 67, respectively.

That is what I have. Please can you check?

Angus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
124 visitors (0 registered, 124 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5