S×F vari­­ance: Followup [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2015-01-09 02:44 (3828 d 10:38 ago) – Posting: # 14264
Views: 42,577

John: Thanks for the update. I did not count missing subjects. The number of subjects who completed both R1 and R2 =73 for the full replicate data set.

I checked it three times. I did not use the subject numbers in the rows. I used the row numbers (this takes into account missing subject numbers). The subjects are numbered 1 to 78, but there are only 73 rows of subjects in the study.

The number of subjects who completed T1 and T2=69 subjects. {Four subjects missed a treatment with T2}.

So the number of degrees of freedom for R and T is 71 and 67, respectively.

That is what I have. Please can you check?

Angus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,683 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can do one of two things; just shut up,
which is something I don’t find easy,
or learn an awful lot very fast,
which is what I tried to do.    Jane Fonda

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5