S×F vari­­ance: Typo. [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2015-01-08 18:32 (3394 d 05:19 ago) – Posting: # 14257
Views: 39,870

(edited by jag009 on 2015-01-08 19:49)

Hi Helmut,

He basically said computation #2 is pointless at this stage. He said the 0.03 is NOT a criteria, it's an "allowance". In that case then Computation #2 is just for data collection... Also I brought up the S2D computation suggested by Ana (see my post to Angus in this thread) using ABE output (G-matrix). He said it is nonsense (I assume I interpreted the equations correctly to him. I did tell him her computation involves using between-subject variances).

Nope, no Absinthe, just a glass of wine :-)
On another note, ever tried a liquor called "Ever Clear"? 190 Proof... :surprised:

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,655 registered users;
75 visitors (0 registered, 75 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

So far as I can remember,
there is not one word in the Gospels
in praise of intelligence.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5