S×F vari­­ance: Typo. [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2015-01-08 18:32 (3831 d 11:23 ago) – Posting: # 14257
Views: 42,771

(edited on 2015-01-08 19:49)

Hi Helmut,

He basically said computation #2 is pointless at this stage. He said the 0.03 is NOT a criteria, it's an "allowance". In that case then Computation #2 is just for data collection... Also I brought up the S2D computation suggested by Ana (see my post to Angus in this thread) using ABE output (G-matrix). He said it is nonsense (I assume I interpreted the equations correctly to him. I did tell him her computation involves using between-subject variances).

Nope, no Absinthe, just a glass of wine :-)
On another note, ever tried a liquor called "Ever Clear"? 190 Proof... :surprised:

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,676 registered users;
22 visitors (0 registered, 22 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5