S×F vari­­ance [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2015-01-06 19:48 (4190 d 08:36 ago) – Posting: # 14228
Views: 46,208

Helmut: my interest in Phoenix was to get within subject test variance (WT instead of WR. Following your suggestion I copied and pasted "Prepare data sets for analysis" to create a second one.

Therefore I changed the code over in the second one from R2 and R1 to T2 and T1 as shown in the photo below: Subsequently there was little changes required {just to the text} to get WT]

[image]

it seemed to work well: I note that the value obtained (0.1186) was slightly higher than John's value (0.11654). Of course the WR information is retained in the original "Prepare Data sets for analysis"

I cannot see anything wrong; it seemed to be straight forward, but I am interested in why John got a different value in SAS. I think he experienced a problem doing this in Phoenix. I hope he see this.


Angus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
329 visitors (0 registered, 329 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5