Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Forget Westlake’s symmetrical CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2015-01-06 15:38 (3396 d 16:19 ago) – Posting: # 14225
Views: 6,436

Hi Hötzi,

❝ • sum up to 0.1 and

❝ • the limits of the CI are symmetrical around 1.

❝ • The patient’s risk is maintained and their physicians are less confused.

I love it, especially the middle one. It just does not strike me as being connected to the real world in any meaningful way
Quite possible it made sense to somebody. At some point. Perhaps. Or maybe not.

I wonder what the figures will look like for a drug which proves to be BE but with 1.00 not part of the conventional 90% CI?

Complete thread:

• IC90 vs IW90 Netzolin 2015-01-05 19:06 [General Sta­tis­tics] 
  • Forget Westlake’s symmetrical CI Helmut 2015-01-06 01:43
    • Forget Westlake’s symmetrical CIElMaestro 2015-01-06 14:38
      • Forget Westlake’s symmetrical CI Helmut 2015-01-07 00:41
        • My mistake ElMaestro 2015-01-07 05:01
          • My mistake nobody 2015-01-07 12:16