S×F vari­­ance [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2014-12-24 02:39 (4196 d 02:10 ago) – Posting: # 14155
Views: 46,784

THANKS JOHN: Allow me to point our to you that from Barbara Davit's article if the regular BE test applies on any of the metrics (<0.294) then you do not use the reference scaled approach. You simply use the average BE test and discontinue the interest in RSABE. So that means that upper confidence interval of sigma D2 does not apply in cases where average BE is used for a metric?...yes?

The metric most at at risk with Concerta is the latest one ( I am thinking).

Angus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
137 visitors (0 registered, 137 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5