S×F vari­­ance [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2014-12-24 02:39 (4205 d 06:27 ago) – Posting: # 14155
Views: 46,955

THANKS JOHN: Allow me to point our to you that from Barbara Davit's article if the regular BE test applies on any of the metrics (<0.294) then you do not use the reference scaled approach. You simply use the average BE test and discontinue the interest in RSABE. So that means that upper confidence interval of sigma D2 does not apply in cases where average BE is used for a metric?...yes?

The metric most at at risk with Concerta is the latest one ( I am thinking).

Angus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
421 visitors (0 registered, 421 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5