S×F variance [General Statistics]
I understand immediately below very well
❝ Regrettably I had too little spare time to dive into. However, some points:
❝ 1. #14138: John is correct that the setup should essentially follow FDA’s code for RSABE. Therefore, anything obtained from ABE is not useful.
But I cannot reconcile it with immediately below, since this pertains to the average BE part of the template so why do it if you are focusing on RSABE?
❝ Modifying the ABE-part doesn’t do the job (see #1 above). What you could do: Copy the entire Prepare Data for RSABE analysis
workflow and change the coding in the second one from R to T. Don’t forget to change all filters and transformations. Then you have both the results for R and T. Proceed from there.
Also I had planned on doing the three chi-squared calculations in NCSS described in Part 4 of the new Methylphendiate Guidance (2014). I am puzzled by how you can do this in Phoenix (see below)
❝ Ana’s new templates removed the clumsy workaround for joining values of the χ², since chiinv(p, df)
was introduced in PHX/WNL6.4 and can be used in the custom transformation.
Angus
Complete thread:
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 15:32 [General Statistics]
- S×F varianceAngusMcLean 2014-12-23 16:32
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 17:17
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-28 23:12
- S×F variance Helmut 2014-12-23 17:17
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 20:56
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-23 23:07
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 01:39
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-24 16:21
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 17:50
- S×F variance jag009 2014-12-24 16:21
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-06 17:30
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-08 22:42
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-09 01:44
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-12 16:53
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-12 20:56
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion Helmut 2015-01-13 01:25
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-13 20:13
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-14 21:29
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion AngusMcLean 2015-01-29 23:38
- S×F variance: 3rd opinion Helmut 2015-01-13 01:25
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-30 23:24
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-02 16:31
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-02 17:22
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-05 18:14
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 01:39
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-06 17:13
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 19:36
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-17 22:49
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-19 23:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-21 21:08
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-22 17:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-23 16:58
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-22 17:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-21 21:08
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-19 23:25
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-17 22:49
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-06 19:36
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-05 18:14
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-02-02 17:22
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-02-02 16:31
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-12 20:56
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-12 16:53
- S×F variance: Followup AngusMcLean 2015-01-09 01:44
- S×F variance: Followup jag009 2015-01-08 22:42
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-24 01:39
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-06 18:48
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-07 21:28
- S×F variance Helmut 2015-01-08 16:10
- S×F variance: Typo. jag009 2015-01-08 17:32
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 18:51
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:02
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 20:27
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:33
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 20:27
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-08 20:02
- S×F variance AngusMcLean 2015-01-08 18:51
- S×F variance: Typo. jag009 2015-01-08 17:32
- S×F variance Helmut 2015-01-08 16:10
- S×F variance jag009 2015-01-07 21:28
- S×F varianceAngusMcLean 2014-12-23 16:32