Question [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2014-12-10 19:34 (3423 d 13:50 ago) – Posting: # 14050
Views: 11,777

ANA is the GURU:

SEE HER EMAIL

G(2,2) = sig_BR^2 = lambda(2,1)^2+lambda(2,2)^2

G(1,2) = rho*sig_BT*sig_BR = lambda(1,1)*lambda(2,1) (= between subject covariance for test and reference)

THE SIGMA SQUARED D calculation is shown in one of my posts from yesterday. The co variate term is subtracted from the sum of the other two parameters.

From Helmut's post above to the European document the following narrative is obtained.

This model allows a different subject effect for each formulation (i.e. a subject by formulation interaction), and therefore has 5 variance terms:


(1) Within subject for reference
(2) Within Subject for Test
(3) Between Subject for Test
(4) Between Subject for Reference
(5) Covariance for between subject test and reference

It also states the last three are "combined" to give the subject ×formulation interaction variance component.

From Ana’s letter the "combination" involves the addition of (3+4)-5.
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,656 registered users;
133 visitors (0 registered, 133 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5