Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Update: S×F variance test [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2014-12-09 19:30 (3864 d 16:25 ago) – Posting: # 14040
Views: 13,920

Thanks for the update: SAS will give a very similar result. According to Helmut SAS assigns 0 to negative variance values and we see this in the post from India. We have to keep in mind that this data set is simulated and this is surely the source of the problem?

Once you complete SAS work then we can compare results of the upper confidence interval calculation for sigmaD² comparison given in the Guidance. I have already an Excel spreadsheet plus chi squared from another program to provide the upper CI. I need to verify my results by comparison with someone else.

So far what I see is very high values for upper CI, but this could be due to lack of an actual data set

Thread locked

Complete thread:

Concerta Guidance: Sub x Form interaction variance test jag009 2014-12-05 20:57 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Concerta Guidance: Sub x Form interaction variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-06 01:28
  - Concerta Guidance: Sub x Form interaction variance test Helmut 2014-12-06 01:53
    - Concerta Guidance: Sub x Form interaction variance test jag009 2014-12-07 20:58
      - Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-08 01:35
        
        Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test Helmut 2014-12-08 14:12
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-08 17:40
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-08 18:09
        
        EMA’s dataset I Helmut 2014-12-08 18:18
        
        EMA’s dataset I AngusMcLean 2014-12-08 19:55
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-08 20:41
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-08 18:18
        
        Question jag009 2014-12-10 17:01
        
        Question AngusMcLean 2014-12-10 18:34
        
        Update: S×F variance test kumarnaidu 2014-12-09 06:48
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-09 15:16
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-09 17:47
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-09 18:01
        
        Update: S×F variance testAngusMcLean 2014-12-09 18:30
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-18 15:31
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-18 16:12
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-22 17:28
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-22 19:32
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-22 20:19
        
        Update: S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-22 20:45
        
        Update: S×F variance jag009 2014-12-22 20:51
        
        Update: S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-22 21:10
        Update: S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-22 21:36
        
        Update: S×F variance jag009 2014-12-22 22:18
        
        Update: S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-22 23:26
        
        Update: S×F variance jag009 2014-12-23 04:43
        
        Update: S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 15:24
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-09 21:03
        
        Coding Helmut 2014-12-09 18:49
        
        working.... jag009 2014-12-09 22:24
- Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test ElMaestro 2014-12-06 11:12
  - Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-07 14:32
    - Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test ElMaestro 2014-12-07 18:08
      - Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-07 23:13
        
        Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test ElMaestro 2014-12-08 12:25
        
        Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test nobody 2014-12-08 13:44
        Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-08 14:03
        
        Concerta Guidance:S×F variance test nobody 2014-12-08 14:32

Update: S×F vari­­ance test [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Complete thread:

Update: S×F variance test [Regulatives / Guidelines]