No RSABE [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-12-09 14:18 (4222 d 11:43 ago) – Posting: # 14033
Views: 15,196

Hi Kumar,

❝ One thing I want to confirm here that if for any of the parameter Swr >0.294 observed then can we use scaled approach there?:confused:


I don’t think so. Quoting the guidance:

The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean test/reference (T/R) ratios for the above five Cmax and AUC metrics (Cmax, AUC0-T1, AUCT1-T2, AUCT2-T3, AUC0-∞) should fall within the limits of 80–125%.

Not a single word about reference-scaling. Given the intrasubject variabilities of these metrics I don’t see a justification.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
151 visitors (0 registered, 151 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

When you meet the Buddha, you kill him;
when you meet the patriarchs, you kill them.    Wumen Huikai

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5