Concerta Guidance: S×F vari­­ance test [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2014-12-08 02:35 (4220 d 21:57 ago) – Posting: # 14007
Views: 17,002

if you are using PHOENIX then you can calculate MI FROM:

MI=(σ 2 WT + σ 2 WR )/2 + σ2D

So you check your calculation for MI that way since the other variables are provided by PHOENIX output,


I am doing the much the same thing you are doing, but using Phoenix with the 4 period Full ABAB data set (progesterone) with the FDA template. I understand from Helmut that the progesterone data set is a simulated one.

Here is my result from Phoenix for AUC

σ2D =-0.80391.

So I have a negative value and I wonder if it is due to imperfections associated with simulating or creating your own data set.

Why not try that set in SAS and let me know what you see.

Angus


Edit: Merged from a later post. Note that you can edit your original post within 24 hours. [Helmut]
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
322 visitors (0 registered, 322 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5